I love food with healthy and simple ingredients. I am a recipe developer and food blogger who is inspired by many cultures around the world. Today, I could be in Thailand having a Tom Yum Soup, and tomorrow I will be in France eating bouillabaisse!
Rogue Foodies is for everyone who loves to travel through the food they eat without borders, labels, or travel restrictions!
Become a member to get new recipes in your email every week
Initially, based on that model, This typeface had been created with big serifs, an extreme stem weight, more stem contrast, and gradual terminals with a single slab serif. It was designed by JM Sole and released by Google fonts.
This amazing font family comes in 6 weights that are regular, light, book, medium, extra light, and semibold. The most similar fonts are Beton Extra Bold, Vigor DT Black, and the Rio Grande NF. Available on our website for all your commercial and personal projects.
We have a full version of this typeface that you can freely use in all your personal and official projects. You would need to click on the below download button if you are really interested in this amazing typeface.
You can get many similar fonts to this typeface like Maxxi Serif Bold Font, Holtwood One SC Font but the closest fonts are Beton Extra Bold, Poppins Font, Vigor DT Black, Elephant Font, and the Rio Grande NF.
Alfa Slab One is a contemporary take on the Six-lines Pica Egyptian created by Robert Thorne for the Thorowgood Foundry in 1921. Although initially based on that model, Alfa Slab One was designed with an extreme stem weight, big serifs, more stem contrast and gradual terminals with a single serif. JM Solé designed this and published it through google fonts.
With an elegant look, this font has huge language support. Beton Extra Bold, Vigor DT Black, and the Rio Grande NF are mostly similar to Alfa Slab One font. Free download is available on our website. To Download free, scroll down to our download font section and use it in your projects.
No,Vigor DT is not free to download. You will need to pay for it I'm afraid.Almost every font that we list on HighFonts.com is a paid-for, premium font. We do have a Free Fonts section where we list free fonts that you can download. There is no point trying to find a free download of Vigor DT so please don't waste your time looking.
It is highly unlikely that you'll be able to find Vigor DT for free. There's a lot of websites that will say \"Free Download\" but these are just attempts to get you to click on a link which will either take you to an ad landing page or you risk getting viruses on your computer. In the rare occasion that you do find a free download for Vigor DT remember that it's illegal to use a font if you didn't pay for it!
If you really want Vigor DT and you want to truly own it the legal and safe way, then click here to visit the download and purchase page on MyFonts.com. Here you will be able to obtain the proper license. The designer and publisher deserves to be paid for their work, as they have put in the hours and the creativity to produce such an amazing font. Good luck with your purchase and future use of this font. :)
Within a rational framework, a decision-maker selects actions based on the reward-maximization principle, which stipulates that they acquire outcomes with the highest value at the lowest cost. Action selection can be divided into two dimensions: selecting an action from various alternatives, and choosing its vigor, i.e., how fast the selected action should be executed. Both of these dimensions depend on the values of outcomes, which are often affected as more outcomes are consumed together with their associated actions. Despite this, previous research has only addressed the computational substrate of optimal actions in the specific condition that the values of outcomes are constant. It is not known what actions are optimal when the values of outcomes are non-stationary. Here, based on an optimal control framework, we derive a computational model for optimal actions when outcome values are non-stationary. The results imply that, even when the values of outcomes are changing, the optimal response rate is constant rather than decreasing. This finding shows that, in contrast to previous theories, commonly observed changes in action rate cannot be attributed solely to changes in outcome value. We then prove that this observation can be explained based on uncertainty about temporal horizons; e.g., the session duration. We further show that, when multiple outcomes are available, the model explains probability matching as well as maximization strategies. The model therefore provides a quantitative analysis of optimal action and explicit predictions for future testing.
According to normative theories of decision-making, actions made by humans and animals are chosen with the aim of earning the maximum amount of future reward whilst incurring the lowest cost (Marshall, 1890; von Neumann & Morgenstern, 1947). Within such theories individuals optimize their actions by learning about their surrounding environment so as to satisfy their long-term objectives. The problem of finding the optimal action is, however, argued to have two aspects: (1) choice, i.e., deciding which action to select from several alternatives; and (2) vigor, i.e., deciding how fast the selected action should be executed. For a rat in a Skinner box, for example, the problem of finding the optimal action involves selecting a lever (choice) and deciding at what rate to respond on that lever (vigor). High response rates can have high costs (e.g., in terms of energy consumption), whereas a low response rate could have an opportunity cost if the experimental session ends before the animal has earned sufficient reward. Optimal actions provide the right balance between these two factors and, based on the reinforcement-learning framework and methods from optimal control theory, the characteristics of optimal actions and their consistency with various experimental studies have been previously elaborated (Dayan, 2012; Niv, Daw, Joel, & Dayan, 2007; Niyogi, Shizgal, & Dayan, 2014; Salimpour & Shadmehr, 2014).
Here, building on previous work, we introduce the concept of a reward field, which captures non-stationary outcome values. Using this concept and methods from optimal control theory, we derive the optimal response vigor and choice strategy without assuming that outcome values are stationary. In particular, the results indicate that, even when the values of outcomes are changing, the optimal response rate in a free-operant procedureFootnote 3 is a constant response rate. This finding rules out previous suggestions that the commonly observed decrease in within-session response rates is due to decreases in outcome value (Killeen, 1995). Instead, we show that decreases in within-session response rates can be explained by uncertainty regarding session duration. This later analysis is made possible by explicitly representing session duration in the current model, which is another dimension in which the current model extends previous work. The framework is then extended to choice situations and specific predictions are made concerning the conditions under which the optimal strategy involves maximization or probability matching.
where a and b are constants (Dayan, 2012; Niv et al., 2007). b is the constant cost of each lever press, which is independent of the delay between lever presses whereas the factor a controls the rate-dependent component of the cost. Previous research has established that predictions derived from this definition of cost are consistent with experimental data (Dayan, 2012; Niv et al., 2007). Note that costs such as basal metabolic rate and the cost of operating the brain, although consuming a high portion of energy produced by the body, are not included in the above definition because they are constant and independent of response rate and, therefore, are not directly related to the analysis of response vigor and choice.
In this section, we use the model presented above to analyze optimal response vigor when there is one outcome and one response available in the environment. The analysis is divided into two sections. In the first section, we assume that the decision-maker is certain about session duration, i.e., that the session will continue for T time units, and we will extend this analysis in the next section to a condition in which the decision-maker assumes a probabilistic distribution of session lengths.
Computational models of action selection are essential for understanding decision-making processes in humans and animals, and here we extended these models by providing a general analytical solution to the problem of response vigor and choice. Table 2 shows the summary of the results obtained for different conditions. The results provide (i) a normative basis for commonly observed decrements in within-session response rates, and (ii) a normative explanation for probability matching and reward maximization, as two commonly observed choice strategies.
There are two significant differences between the model proposed here and previous models of response vigor (Dayan, 2012; Niv et al., 2007). Firstly, although the effect of between-session changes in outcome values on response vigor was addressed in previous models (Niv, Joel, & Dayan, 2006), the effects of on-line changes in outcome values within a session were not addressed. On the other hand, the effect of changes in outcome value on the choice between actions has been addressed in some previous models (Keramati & Gutkin, 2014), however their role in determining response vigor has not been investigated. We address such limitations directly in this model. 153554b96e